Author Archives: GiveUpTomorrow

Meg Imperial bashed for playing one of the Chiong sisters in upcoming film

Why upcoming movie ‘Jacqueline Comes Home’ is creating some buzz

Netizens call for ‘Jacqueline Comes Home’ boycott, say true crime film contains false info

United Nations Judgment

A message from Faisal Saifee: I am a barrister-at-law. We were instructed in 2004, following the appeal to the Supreme Court. At that stage the family were desperate and, certainly after the Supreme Court's rejection of the motion for reconsideration, realised that they could not find justice in the Philippines. I was working with Fair Trials International at the time. Previously, I had spent several months in 2003 researching the death penalty and post-conviction remedies in the Philippines. I had also written a published paper titled "Dead Certain: A critical study of the standard of proof in Philippine Death Penalty Cases" and so was uniquely placed to assist. We filed on 15 August 2005, and the United Nations Human Rights Committee adopted its views on 24 July 2006, following a number of written submissions having been made to the Committee. Without a doubt, Paco’s case was the greatest travesty of justice I have encountered in my career. The entire proceedings in the Philippines were blighted by the massive, undue and wholly unprecedented pressure campaign for a conviction. It prevented any possibility of a fair trial. Despite that campaign, even the trial court acquitted Paco of rape and homicide. Astonishingly, the Supreme Court went on to reverse the trial court’s decision without Paco being present, without hearing from the witnesses or even holding a public hearing. Following a thorough review of all proceedings in the Philippines, the United Nations Human Rights Committee concluded in 2006 that there had been multiple violations of Paco’s fundamental rights. He did not have a fair trial or impartial judges. Particularly, the Committee concluded the trial judge “excluded” several key defence witnesses, “put a number of leading questions to the prosecution” and relied on the evidence of an alleged accomplice who had lied about his criminal convictions, was granted immunity from prosecution and who admitted raping one of the victims. Crucially, the Committee concluded “neither the trial court nor the Supreme Court” properly considered Paco’s case. The international system is there to intervene for the case that has gone very badly wrong. This was that case and the Human Rights Committee’s views must be respected. -Faisal Saifee Larrañaga UN JUDGMENT

Philippine Daily Inquirer Global Reviews Give Up Tomorrow

If you get a chance, see this film. And be filled with despair and rage.
Great review and synopsis of the case by Luis H. Francia on the Inquirer Global site, the international home of the Philippine Daily Inquirer.

Huffington Post Mentions Give Up Tomorrow

"TAA was the first of any market, we didn't have any grants at that point, and it was where it all began for us. It was were all the dominos started falling."
Huffington Post contributor E. Nina Rothe of Bespoke Magazine discusses the Tribeca All Access Program and the market for documentary funding.

Michael’s Hometown Paper Covers Give Up Tomorrow

The Worcester Telegram & Gazette interviews Give Up Tomorrow director Michael Collins about his career and the inspiration and production of the film.

VIMooZ Interview With Michael

Check out this interview about the making of the film, the Justice for Paco, Justice for All campaign, as well as Michael and Marty's plans for future film projects.

Libertas Film Magazine Review

Frankly, after watching Tomorrow, it is impossible to maintain any pretense of uncertainty regarding Larrañaga’s innocence.
LFM give a great review focusing on the details of the case and Paco's innocence.

Variety Review

"A remarkably cogent docu, "Give Up Tomorrow"chronicles the case of a young man wrongly convicted of rape and murder, exposing a major miscarriage of justice"
Another great review. This time from Variety!